Navigating TRAIGA: Building compliant and responsible AI in Texas
With Naaia, align your AI systems with TRAIGA’s specific requirements, from prohibited practices and non-discrimination rules to NIST-based safe harbour and enforcement exposure.
Assess your complianceScope, applicability and who it covers
The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), effective from January 1, 2026, marks a key milestone in the regulation of artificial intelligence systems in the United States.
This legislation aims to govern the development and use of AI in commercial or political contexts, or in interactions with consumers, where individuals located in Texas are affected.
It directly applies to developers, deployers, and distributors of AI systems.
AI risks, discrimination and deepfake restrictions
The Act introduces clear prohibitions on certain high-risk uses, including behavioural manipulation, unlawful discrimination, social scoring by public authorities, and biometric identification without consent.
It also prohibits the development of AI systems designed to generate illegal content, particularly sexually explicit deepfakes.
More broadly, any use intended to infringe upon constitutional rights is strictly forbidden, reinforcing the protection of fundamental rights within AI governance.
Transparency, NIST Safe Harbour and penalties
TRAIGA establishes targeted obligations, particularly around transparency for public sector entities and healthcare providers.
It also introduces mechanisms that support responsible innovation, such as a “safe harbour” based on recognised frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, as well as a regulatory sandbox enabling AI systems to be tested under supervision.
Non-compliance with these provisions may result in significant civil penalties, reaching up to $200,000, along with daily fines in cases of ongoing violations.
With Naaia
Map your scope under TRAIGA
Identify whether your AI systems fall within TRAIGA’s scope based on deployment in Texas, consumer interaction, and impact on individuals.
Embed TRAIGA’s prohibited use framework
Integrate clear guardrails against behavioural manipulation, unlawful discrimination, social scoring, and unlawful biometric identification.
Structure compliance with recognized frameworks
Align your governance with NIST AI Risk Management Framework to leverage TRAIGA’s safe harbour mechanism.
Operationalize transparency and accountability
Implement the required disclosures for public sector and healthcare use, while preparing for enforcement by the Texas Attorney General.
Learn about other regulations & norms
Frequently asked questions
-
Which companies must comply with the Texas TRAIGA, and when did it take effect?
Effective since January 1, 2026, the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) applies to individuals and organizations that operate in Texas, offer products or services used by Texas residents, or develop or deploy AI systems in the state. The law primarily targets certain sensitive uses of AI, particularly harmful manipulation of human behavior, intentional discrimination, infringements of constitutional rights, social scoring by government entities, and certain biometric uses. It also establishes transparency obligations for government entities and for certain uses of AI in healthcare services.
-
What is the TRAIGA safe harbour provision, and how can organizations qualify for it?
TRAIGA includes a safe harbour provision that significantly reduces an organization’s liability exposure if it can demonstrate adherence to a recognized AI risk management framework. Organizations qualify for the safe harbour by implementing a documented AI governance program aligned with a recognized standard (such as NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or an equivalent framework), conducting regular impact assessments for consequential AI uses, and maintaining records of governance activities sufficient to demonstrate compliance. The safe harbour shifts the burden of proof: an organization with documented governance is presumed to have acted in good faith.
-
How can organizations prepare for TRAIGA compliance?
TRAIGA compliance preparation should focus on four areas:
(1) Inventory — identify all AI systems that make or influence consequential decisions affecting Texas residents;
(2) Impact assessments — conduct algorithmic impact assessments for each in-scope system, documenting potential risks to affected individuals;
(3) Governance program — implement a formal AI governance program aligned with a recognized framework to qualify for the TRAIGA safe harbour;
(4) Documentation — maintain audit-ready records of all governance activities, system changes, and incident responses.
Organizations that have already implemented ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF governance programs are well-positioned for TRAIGA compliance, as the documentation requirements overlap significantly.